Which action regarding an impaled object in a client who survived an earthquake is incorrect?

Study for the Disaster Planning Adaptive Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice to strengthen your understanding. Each question offers hints and explanations, preparing you fully for disaster planning scenarios and skills!

Removing an impaled object from a wound is generally inappropriate and considered a dangerous action in emergency medical scenarios. This is because removing the object can cause further injury, increase bleeding, and lead to serious complications such as damage to surrounding tissues or organs. In situations where a patient has survived a disaster like an earthquake, the priority is to stabilize the existing injuries rather than exacerbate them by attempting to remove anything that is stuck in place.

In the context of managing an impaled object, best practices dictate that the object should be stabilized to prevent movement, which could worsen the injury. Covering the wound with a sterile dressing is also a critical step to prevent infection and further contamination. Additionally, monitoring the patient for signs of shock is vital as it can indicate serious internal injury or bleeding that requires immediate attention and intervention. Each of these actions is designed to provide care that minimizes risk and focuses on the well-being of the client.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy